Civil Society

May 24, 2007

Ministry of Civil Affairs Releases New Statistics for 2006

The Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs (MOCA) released new comprehensive statistics for 2006, including the numbers of civil society organizations, villager and residents committees, and recipients of welfare programs in a May 23 post on their website. 

The official numbers show a steady increase in the numbers of registered Chinese civil society organizations, including 192,000 social organizations (SOs), 161,000 non-governmental, non-commercial enterprises (NGNCE's), and 1144 foundations. (These numbers differ slightly from those released in January.) 

They also reveal an interesting decline in the total numbers of villager committees and residents committees over the past ten years, and a plateau over the past four years in the number of urban residents who are receiving welfare assistance. 

Continue reading "Ministry of Civil Affairs Releases New Statistics for 2006" »

March 26, 2007

Analysis: Henan Circular on Peaceful Construction

The Henan Provincial Party Committee and Government jointly issued a circular on April 26, 2006 that calls on provincial authorities to strengthen their controls over society and address a range of social problems during the period 2006 to 2010 as a means towards conducting "peaceful construction," establishing a "harmonious society," "improv[ing] the Party's ruling capacity," and "solidif[ying] the Party's position in power." Specific goals listed in the circular overlap with in the Opinion on Promoting the Construction of a New Socialist Countryside, issued by the Communist Party Central Committee (CPCC) and the State Council (SC) on December 31, 2005, and an earlier opinion issued by the general offices of the CPCC and the SC.

Continue reading "Analysis: Henan Circular on Peaceful Construction" »

February 09, 2007

The Law on Professonial Farmers Cooperatives - Mild Liberalization for Rural Chinese Civil Society?

Chinese authorities have implemented somewhat liberal reforms with respect to rural civil society organizations in issuing the he Law on Professional Farmers' Cooperatives [LPFC] on October 31, 2006 (effective on July 1, 2007).  The law creates a channel for farmers to register and obtain legal status for organizations that they create to protect their collective economic interests.  The LPFC requires farmers to register professional farmers' cooperatives with the Ministry of Industry and Commerce, but does not subject them to the sponsorship requirement that Chinese authorities use to control the growth of civil society organizations such as social organizations or non-governmental, non-commerical enterprises.

Continue reading "The Law on Professonial Farmers Cooperatives - Mild Liberalization for Rural Chinese Civil Society?" »

February 07, 2007

What's Happening With Chinese Civil Society?

People keep asking me the above question.  Generally, it comes in one of two forms.  The first is: are Chinese authorities liberalizing or tightening their controls over domestic and foreign civil society organizations in China.  The second is: what are the interesting topical areas to focus on for organizations that want to do work in China.

Two recent speeches by Ministry of Civil Affairs (MOCA) officials on January 31, 2007 shed some additional light on these topics, the first by MOCA Vice-Minister Jiang Li, and the second by the director of MOCA's Bureau for the Management of Civil Society Organizations, Sun Weilin.  Highlights include:

  • The State Council's Standing Committee is currently reviewing the revisions to the 1998 regulations governing social organizations.  Sun's speech notes that MOCA has already submitted these to the State Council's Standing Committee.
  • Chinese authorities are moving ahead with the creation of a new "rating" system for civil society organizations. Experimental projects have been launched in a number of different regions and areas.
  • MOCA officials are making strong efforts to increase their work with rural professional economic associations.  This follows emphasis in the Party's "No. 1 Document" for 2007 regarding the importance of these organizations.
  • Chinese authorities continue to supress and root out illegal, unregistered civil society organizations.

So, to return to the initial two questions. First, are Chinese authorities loosening or tightening their restrictions on civil society organizations?

Chinese authorities have clearly taken additional steps to curtail civil society organizations in the past two years.  Monitoring and harassment of these groups has increased, and there has been a "virtual paralysis" on the registration of new groups, as the Congressional-Executive Commission on China noted in the civil society section of its 2006 Annual Report. 

But Chinese authorities are undecided on how to proceed.  Expected revisions to the 1998 regulations have languished for five years.  There seems to be some serious internal debate inside the Chinese bureaucracy on exactly how to manage these organizations.  Earlier MOCA versions of the draft regulations apparently would have done away with the requirement that civil society groups have a Party or government sponsor organization in order to register and obtain legal status.  But State Council officials appear to have vetoed these proposals, as as the Congressional-Executive Commission on China noted in the civil society section of its 2005 Annual Report.  The sponsor organization requirement is one of the key devices by which Chinese authorities keep a check on the development of independent Chinese civil society organizations.

In all likelihood, whenever the regulations do issue, the sponsor organization requirement will be retained.  Media reports on the MOCA draft have noted as much. It's also likely that the sponsor organization requirement will be expanded to include foreign NGOs operating in China as well. Sun's speech notes that the revised regulations "severely need to come out, in order to respond to challenges presented by foreign civil society organizations."  Moreover, when Chinese authorities revised their regulations on foundations in 2003, the sponsor organization requirement was extended to cover both foreign and domestic groups.  (For more information, see the article on page 110 of  the April 2004 issue of the International Journal of Civil Society Law) It seems likely that the newly issued foundation regulations would serve as a template for future revisions to the corresponding 1998 regulations governing social organizations and non-governmental, non-commercial enterprises.

The second question: what are the interesting topical areas to focus on for organizations that want to do work in China.  Take a good hard look at the rural professional economic associations.  Chinese leaders have particularly emphasized the importance of resolving rural problems, and have specifically indicated a degree of openness in working with these groups.  Since one of the main problems faced by Chinese farmers is a lack of organizational structures to use to defend their collective interests, the development of these groups is a particularly interesting and positive.  Of course, how it plays out in practice remains an open question.

January 29, 2007

Chinese Authorities "No. 1 Document" For 2007 Emphasizes Agricultural Economy

The Chinese Communist Party Central Committee and State Council issued a joint opinion on January 29, identifying improvement of the agricultural economy as their main policy goal for 2007.   

The opinion, titled "Several Opinions Regarding Actively Developing Modern Agriculture and Firmly Advancing the Construction of the New Socialist Countryside" is the "Number One" document for 2007.  Chinese authorities use these "Number One" documents annually as a means to highlight policies for the coming year.  Each "Number One" document issued since 2004 has focused on rural issues.

The opinion heavily emphasizes agricultural economic development.  Reform measures include: increased agricultural investment, improved market access for agricultural products, encouraging rural technical innovation, and strengthening rural infrastructure

In contrast, the opinion only briefly addresses issues of rural governance reform.  It broadly calls on authorities to clean up the problems of local government debts, better address issues of land seizures, reform the system of agricultural credit, and continue experiments with reforming and trimming local government personnel.   

The opinion contains general language calling for strengthening rural institutions to address social instability.

Strengthen and improve rural social management.  With regard to new developments in the rural economy and society, develop new mechanisms of rural social managment to firmly strengthen the work of upholding rural social stability.  Expand channels for the expression of public opinion in rural society.  Construct and perfect mechanisms for the channeling and resolution of disputes.  Comprehensively use multiple measures and methods to appropriately resolve consistent and latent rural social problems.  Deeply expand "peaceful construction," strengthen the construction of rural police forces, carry out well the comprehensive management of public security in rural society, and ensure that  rural areas are peaceful and orderly.  Broadly carry out legal educational propaganda activities in rural areas and increase the masses' legal understanding.  Guide farmers to express their interests and demands in a legal and reasonable manner, and lawfully exercise their rights and  carry out their duties.  Construct management mechanisms to respond to rural emergencies, and improve abilities to respond to crises.

The emphasis of the 2007 opinion differs from the 2006 "No. 1 Document" , the Opinion on Promoting the Construction of a New Socialist Countryside, which emphasized many specific governance reforms, as noted in analysis provided by the Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC).  For example, the 2007 opinion contains no explicit call for reforms to the Chinese hukou (household registration) system, nor specific details and timetable for realizing improvements in the provision of rural health and education services, unlike the 2006 opinion. 

The 2007 opinion repeats the emphasis of the 2006 opinion on the need for Party leadership of rural work. The 2007 opinion also strengthens a call made in the 2006 opinion for strengthening professional farmer cooperatives.  Some provincial authorities have experimented with more independent forms of rural professional associations as a means of allowing farmers additional channels to protect their rights, as noted in the CECC analysisThe 2007 opinion also repeats a call made by central authorities in recent weeks to strengthen the use of financial incentives, as opposed to coercive measures,to ensure citizen compliance with official birth control policies.

The 2007 opinion may reflect a desire to shelve the more difficult issues of rural governance reform in favor of efforts to address technical issues of rural economic reform, particularly in the politically sensitive runup period prior to the 17th Party Congress in the fall.  Chinese authorities themselves have admitted that some official governance reform efforts, such as those aimed at addressing hukou reform, have faltered upon meeting internal bureaucratic opposition.

January 17, 2007

Ministry of Civil Affairs Releases 2006 Statistics

The Ministry of Civil Affairs (MOCA) released comprehensive 2006 statistics on areas such as civil society organizations and numbers of receipents of domestic social security programs, in a January 16 post on their website. 

The official numbers show a steady increase in the numbers of officially registered Chinese civil society organizations, including 186,000 social organizations (SOs), 159,000 non-governmental, non-commercial enterprises (NGNCE's), and 1138 foundations.  A seperate MOCA announcement detailing MOCA accomplishments for 2006 notes the creation of a enforcement and supervision bureau, aimed at "upholding social order by timely and effectively uncovering illegal civil society organizations and violations of the law by civil society organizations."

Below is a comprehensive statistical table of Chinese civil society organizations, compiling information from the 2006 and 2005 MOCA statistical releases, and an earlier table on the website of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China.

Organization type

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Registered SOs (in thousands)

137

131

129

133

142

153

168

186

Registered NGNCEs (in thousands)

6

23

82

111

124

135

  146

159

Foundations 

   

   

   

   

   

   

99

1138

January 10, 2007

Civil Society

Civil Society 1

Blog Editor

  • Carl Minzner
    Associate Professor of Law, Washington University School of Law in St. Louis
Blog powered by TypePad